Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Elsa Jacquemot vs Flavie Brugnone Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Jacquemot vs Brugnone analysis and find out who is favored!
Elsa Jacquemot vs Flavie Brugnone Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Jacquemot 1 - 0 Brugnone
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Jacquemot has won 41.22% of points on their second serve, while Brugnone has won 45.28%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Jacquemot, in recent form, has won 54.84% of their opponent's second serve points, while Brugnone has won 56.65%. The same stats for first serve returns are 39.96% and 44.25% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Jacquemot has saved 52.58% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Brugnone has saved 47.44% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Jacquemot has won 57.14% of matches played (W/L 44/ 33), with Brugnone winning 48.28% (W/L 14/ 15) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Jacquemot has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 56% (W/L 55/ 43), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 20% (W/L 1/ 4). Brugnone has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 50% (W/L 32/ 32), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 29% (W/L 6/ 15).
- Player level: In the last year, Jacquemot has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 60% of matches (W/L 36/ 24), where as Brugnone has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 50% of matches (W/L 9/ 9). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Jacquemot winning 1 times and Brugnone being victorious 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Jacquemot winning 2 and Brugnone winning 0. The last match between Jacquemot and Brugnone was at the W60 Croissy-Beaubourg, 29-03-2022, First, I.hard with Elsa Jacquemot getting the victory 6-3 6-1.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:10:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Jacquemot and Brugnone have played a deciding set 0 times, with Jacquemot winning 0 times and Brugnone 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Jacquemot winning 0, and Brugnone 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Jacquemot has played against opponents with an average rank of 277.04 while Brugnone has played against players with an average rank of 204.72.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Jacquemot has won 53% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Brugnone has won 38% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Jacquemot has converted 45.2% of breakpoint opportunities, and Brugnone has converted 51.25% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
159
Rank
143
High
21
Age
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
1
Indoor0
0
Grass0
884
Rank
688
High
21
Age
Plays
L
W
W
W
L
W
W
L
L
L
Form
W
L
W
L
L
W
W
W
L
L
53% (134-120)
Career Total W/L
45% (55-68)
57% (17-13)
YTD W/L
50% (6-6)
$273,923
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Elsa Jacquemot | Flavie Brugnone |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
| Games Won | 12 | 4 |
| Aces (Total) | 1 | 1 |
| DFs (Total) | 6 | 5 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:10:0 | 1:10:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 51% (26/51) | 61% (38/62) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 88% (23/26) | 53% (20/38) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 48% (12/25) | 33% (8/24) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 42% (5/12) | 20% (1/5) |
| Return Points W% | 55% (34/62) | 31% (16/51) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-3 6-1 |
Stats 
Elsa Jacquemot
Player
Flavie Brugnone
51%
(
26 of
51)
1st Serve %
61%
(
38 of
62)
1
Aces
1
6
Double Faults
5
88%
(
23 of
26)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
20 of
38)
48%
(
12 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
8 of
24)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
31%
(
16 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
34 of
62)
69
Total Points Won
44
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Elsa Jacquemot | Flavie Brugnone |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 57% (17/13) | 50% (6/6) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 53% (38/34) | 50% (13/13) |
| Games Win/Loss | 51% (347/340) | 52% (123/114) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 50% (2/2) | 55% (6/5) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 50% (8/8) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 70% (7/3) | 0% (0/1) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.41 | 0.09 |
| Aces Total | 138 | 10 |
| DFs per game | 0.45 | 0.25 |
| DFs Total | 150 | 29 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:51:2 | 1:10:55 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 318.53 | 388.58 |
| 1st Serve % | 60% (1315/2198) | 63% (363/575) |
| 1st Serve W% | 65% (853/1315) | 56% (202/363) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 42% (372/883) | 45% (96/212) |
| BPs Won% Total | 45% (134/297) | 51% (41/80) |
| Return Pts W% | 45% (1051/2314) | 48% (288/594) |
| Slam W/L | 33% (1/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 25% (1/3) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 65% (15/8) | 50% (3/3) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 50% (3/3) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 57% (17/30) | 50% (6/12) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 33% (2/6) | 33% (1/3) |
| Deciding Set W% | 67% (8/12) | 50% (1/2) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (10/10) | 86% (7/6) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (10/0) | 14% (7/1) |
| 1st set L, W | 35% (20/7) | 0% (5/0) |
Elsa Jacquemot Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Ana Bogdan
Player
Elsa Jacquemot
55%
(
23 of
42)
1st Serve %
49%
(
24 of
49)
0
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
4
70%
(
16 of
23)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
16 of
24)
68%
(
13 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
7 of
25)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
31%
(
13 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
26 of
49)
55
Total Points Won
36
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Erika Andreeva
Player
Elsa Jacquemot
67%
(
38 of
57)
1st Serve %
55%
(
29 of
53)
1
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
3
66%
(
25 of
38)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
14 of
29)
47%
(
9 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
9 of
24)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
40%
(
23 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
30 of
53)
64
Total Points Won
46
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Diana Shnaider
Player
Elsa Jacquemot
65%
(
97 of
150)
1st Serve %
54%
(
68 of
127)
2
Aces
8
8
Double Faults
14
60%
(
58 of
97)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
46 of
68)
47%
(
25 of
53)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
24 of
59)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
19%
(
6 of
32)
45%
(
67 of
150)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
57 of
127)
140
Total Points Won
137
|
7-5 4-6 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Elsa Jacquemot
Player
Heather Watson
59%
(
60 of
101)
1st Serve %
56%
(
64 of
114)
10
Aces
2
7
Double Faults
7
67%
(
40 of
60)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
37 of
64)
51%
(
21 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
22 of
50)
53%
(
8 of
15)
Break Points Won
50%
(
5 of
10)
40%
(
40 of
101)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
55 of
114)
116
Total Points Won
99
|
6-7(7) 6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Elsa Jacquemot
Player
Miriam Bianca Bulgaru
63%
(
45 of
72)
1st Serve %
64%
(
39 of
61)
7
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
3
80%
(
36 of
45)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
24 of
39)
33%
(
9 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
8 of
22)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
38%
(
27 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
29 of
61)
74
Total Points Won
59
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Selena Janicijevic
Player
Elsa Jacquemot
52%
(
32 of
62)
1st Serve %
55%
(
38 of
69)
1
Aces
4
5
Double Faults
7
53%
(
17 of
32)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
18 of
38)
50%
(
15 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
11 of
31)
47%
(
7 of
15)
Break Points Won
71%
(
5 of
7)
48%
(
30 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
40 of
69)
72
Total Points Won
59
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Elsa Jacquemot
Player
Olivia Gadecki
47%
(
25 of
53)
1st Serve %
65%
(
36 of
55)
7
Aces
0
10
Double Faults
4
80%
(
20 of
25)
1st Serve Won
42%
(
15 of
36)
43%
(
12 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
6 of
19)
58%
(
7 of
12)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
40%
(
21 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
34 of
55)
66
Total Points Won
42
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Elsa Jacquemot
Player
Katarina Zavatska
52%
(
32 of
62)
1st Serve %
52%
(
26 of
50)
4
Aces
0
6
Double Faults
3
66%
(
21 of
32)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
13 of
26)
43%
(
13 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
9 of
24)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
45%
(
28 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
28 of
50)
62
Total Points Won
50
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Elsa Jacquemot
Player
Solana Sierra
60%
(
43 of
72)
1st Serve %
77%
(
41 of
53)
6
Aces
4
5
Double Faults
1
77%
(
33 of
43)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
26 of
41)
38%
(
11 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
3 of
12)
29%
(
4 of
14)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
39%
(
28 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
24 of
53)
68
Total Points Won
57
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Clara Burel
Player
Elsa Jacquemot
50%
(
29 of
58)
1st Serve %
58%
(
34 of
59)
2
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
5
72%
(
21 of
29)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
19 of
34)
52%
(
15 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
8 of
25)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
38%
(
22 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
32 of
59)
68
Total Points Won
49
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Flavie Brugnone Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Arlinda Rushiti
Player
Flavie Brugnone
69%
(
34 of
49)
1st Serve %
63%
(
33 of
52)
1
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
3
65%
(
22 of
34)
1st Serve Won
39%
(
13 of
33)
67%
(
10 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
7 of
19)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
35%
(
17 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
32 of
52)
64
Total Points Won
37
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Katarina Kuzmova
Player
Flavie Brugnone
69%
(
44 of
64)
1st Serve %
70%
(
60 of
86)
6
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
4
77%
(
34 of
44)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
34 of
60)
35%
(
7 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
12 of
26)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
100%
(
3 of
3)
36%
(
23 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
40 of
86)
81
Total Points Won
69
|
7-6(3) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Flavie Brugnone
Player
Alisa Kummel
66%
(
48 of
73)
1st Serve %
76%
(
58 of
76)
1
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
1
67%
(
32 of
48)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
29 of
58)
32%
(
8 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
5 of
18)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
45%
(
33 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
42 of
76)
82
Total Points Won
67
|
6-2 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Flavie Brugnone
Player
Mana Ayukawa
70%
(
43 of
61)
1st Serve %
66%
(
31 of
47)
0
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
2
63%
(
27 of
43)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
15 of
31)
44%
(
8 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
5 of
16)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
43%
(
26 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
27 of
47)
62
Total Points Won
46
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Flavie Brugnone
Player
Annabelle Lammas
61%
(
22 of
36)
1st Serve %
51%
(
25 of
49)
3
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
6
86%
(
19 of
22)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
11 of
25)
57%
(
8 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
21%
(
5 of
24)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
25%
(
9 of
36)
Rtn Points Won
67%
(
33 of
49)
60
Total Points Won
25
|
6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Diana Martynov
Player
Flavie Brugnone
62%
(
36 of
58)
1st Serve %
55%
(
29 of
53)
0
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
3
64%
(
23 of
36)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
14 of
29)
59%
(
13 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
12 of
24)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
38%
(
22 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
27 of
53)
63
Total Points Won
48
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Lara Salden
Player
Flavie Brugnone
72%
(
39 of
54)
1st Serve %
70%
(
32 of
46)
-
Aces
-
-
Double Faults
-
54%
(
21 of
39)
1st Serve Won
34%
(
11 of
32)
47%
(
7 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
4 of
14)
70%
(
7 of
10)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
48%
(
26 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
67%
(
31 of
46)
59
Total Points Won
41
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 6-1 6-1 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Carlota Martinez Cirez
Player
Flavie Brugnone
56%
(
40 of
71)
1st Serve %
48%
(
32 of
66)
-
Aces
-
5
Double Faults
4
55%
(
22 of
40)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
15 of
32)
58%
(
18 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
17 of
34)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
67%
(
4 of
6)
44%
(
31 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
34 of
66)
74
Total Points Won
63
|
6-3 7-6(1) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Flavie Brugnone
Player
Anja Wildgruber
59%
(
32 of
54)
1st Serve %
66%
(
42 of
64)
0
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
4
66%
(
21 of
32)
1st Serve Won
40%
(
17 of
42)
36%
(
8 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
8 of
22)
54%
(
7 of
13)
Break Points Won
83%
(
5 of
6)
46%
(
25 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
39 of
64)
68
Total Points Won
50
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Jacquemot Vs Brugnone Prediction H2H Images To Share
More tennis photos of Jacquemot are available here and Brugnone photos here.
Potential H2H Matches This Week For Elsa Jacquemot
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
